Technical CV review
An engineer reads every CV looking for depth, inconsistency, inflated titles, and role fit. We identify what the keywords are hiding and what the experience actually signals.
Skilled engineers undersell themselves. Keyword-heavy CVs rarely back it up. Isazi sits between your shortlist and your client — reviewing CVs, running technical screens, and delivering a clear report within 48 hours.
The problem
React. TypeScript. AWS. PostgreSQL. Microservices. The keywords are everywhere. But they don't tell you whether a candidate has actually shipped production systems, debugged real incidents, or operated at the seniority their profile claims.
Isazi gives recruiters access to engineering judgement before a candidate reaches the client. We help you find the signal underneath the keywords.
What we do
Submit a CV. We'll tell you what it actually means — technically, and in the context of the role you're filling.
An engineer reads every CV looking for depth, inconsistency, inflated titles, and role fit. We identify what the keywords are hiding and what the experience actually signals.
A working engineer interviews each candidate on what they've actually built: systems, tradeoffs, incidents, decisions. Not algorithm questions. Real engineering experience.
Where the role demands it, we give candidates a task grounded in real engineering work — the kind of problem they'd face in their first week, not on a whiteboard.
You receive a written report: seniority verdict, technical strengths, risk areas, and suggested follow-up questions. A clear brief your team can hand to a client.
The Isazi scorecard
Our reports give you and your client a defensible, evidence-backed view of the candidate. We don't rate people out of ten. We explain what we found and why it matters.
Each scorecard covers twelve dimensions of engineering readiness — from production depth to communication clarity — with a clear hiring recommendation at the end.
How it works
Share the job requirements and candidate profiles. Include any client-specific context — seniority expectations, stack requirements, or team structure.
Our engineers review each CV the way a senior hiring manager would. We spot depth, inconsistency, seniority inflation, and misalignment with the role.
A working engineer runs a focused technical screen on the actual role — probing real experience, systems built, and decisions made under pressure.
Within 48 hours, you get a written report with a hiring recommendation, technical risk flags, strengths, and specific questions for your client's interview.
From the blog
When anyone can generate a polished CV in minutes, the document stops being a signal. Here is what to do instead.
Read article →Most companies want to be AI-native. Few know what kind of engineers that actually requires — or how to identify them.
Read article →AI tools can speed up hiring — but only if you know which parts of the process they improve and which parts they make quietly worse.
Read article →Work with Isazi
Start with two or three CVs and see what the process produces. Most screenings are completed within 48 hours. You get a clear report on every candidate — something you can use with confidence.